Home Articles List Article Information
Iranian Journal of Catalysis
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 9 (2019)
Volume Volume 8 (2018)
Volume Volume 7 (2017)
Volume Volume 6 (2016)
Volume Volume 5 (2015)
Volume Volume 4 (2014)
Volume Volume 3 (2013)
Volume Volume 2 (2012)
Volume Volume 1 (2011)
Alipour, Z., Meshkani, F., Rezaei, M. (2019). Kinetic comparison of Ni/Al2O3 and Ni/MgO-Al2O3 nano structure catalysts in CO2 reforming of methane. Iranian Journal of Catalysis, 9(1), 51-61.
Zahra Alipour; Fereshteh Meshkani; Mehran Rezaei. "Kinetic comparison of Ni/Al2O3 and Ni/MgO-Al2O3 nano structure catalysts in CO2 reforming of methane". Iranian Journal of Catalysis, 9, 1, 2019, 51-61.
Alipour, Z., Meshkani, F., Rezaei, M. (2019). 'Kinetic comparison of Ni/Al2O3 and Ni/MgO-Al2O3 nano structure catalysts in CO2 reforming of methane', Iranian Journal of Catalysis, 9(1), pp. 51-61.
Alipour, Z., Meshkani, F., Rezaei, M. Kinetic comparison of Ni/Al2O3 and Ni/MgO-Al2O3 nano structure catalysts in CO2 reforming of methane. Iranian Journal of Catalysis, 2019; 9(1): 51-61.

Kinetic comparison of Ni/Al2O3 and Ni/MgO-Al2O3 nano structure catalysts in CO2 reforming of methane

Article 6, Volume 9, Issue 1, Winter 2019, Page 51-61  XML PDF (2.19 MB)
Document Type: Articles
Authors
Zahra Alipour1; Fereshteh Meshkani email 1, 2; Mehran Rezaei1, 2
1Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Kashan, Km 6 Ravand Road, Kashan, Post Code: 87317-51167, Iran.
2Institute of Nano Science and Nano Technology, University of Kashan, Km 6 Ravand Road, Kashan, Post Code: 87317-51167, Iran.
Abstract
The kinetic characteristics of the Ni/Al2O3 and Ni/MgO-Al2O3 catalysts were investigated in CO2 reforming of methane (CRM). The reaction orders (α and β) and the rate constant (k) were calculated using the non-linear regression analysis, in which the sum of the squared differences of calculated and experimental CO2 reforming of methane rates were minimized. The acquired results demonstrate that the methane partial pressure has a significant influence on the reaction rate compared to the partial pressure of carbon dioxide in CRM and the reaction rate of MgO- modified catalyst was higher than the unmodified sample. This may be due to the higher catalytic activity of Ni/MgO-Al2O3 compared to that of Ni/Al2O3 in CRM. The activation energy for CH4 consumption was higher than that of CO2. Meanwhile, adding CO and H2 to the feed has a negative effect on the reaction rate. The experimental CH4 consumption rates for both Ni/Al2O3 and Ni/Mg-Al2O3 were fitted to some kinetic type models in order to investigate the effect of MgO modifier on the reaction kinetics of the Ni catalyst so the model with the lowest squared error was proposed as the best model describing the reaction rate.
Keywords
Ni catalysts; CO2 reforming of methane; Kinetics; Synthesis gas
References
[1] L. Xu, H. Song, L. Chou, Appl. Catal. B 108-109 (2011) 177-190.
[2] Z. Alipour, M. Rezaei, F. Meshkani. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 20 (2014) 2858-2863.
[3] Ş. Ӧzkara-Aydınoğlu, A.E. Aksoylu, Chem. Eng. J. 215-216 (2013) 542-549.
[4] Z. Alipour, M. Rezaei, F. Meshkani, Fuel 129 (2014) 197-203.
[5] Z. Alipour, M. Rezaei, F. Meshkani, J. Energ. Chem., 23 (2014) 633-638.
[6] F. Mirzaei, M. Rezaei, F. Meshkani, Z. Fattah, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 21 (2015) 662-667.
[7] M. Khajenoori, M. Rezaei, F. Meshkani, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 21 (2015) 717-722.
[8] N. Hadian, M. Rezaei, Z. Mosayebi, F. Meshkani, J. Nat. Gas. Chem. 21 (2012) 200-206.
[9] A.S.A. Al-Fatesh, A.H. Fakeeha, A.E. Abasaeed, Chin. J. Catal. 32 (2011) 1604-1609.
[10] X. Yu, N. Wang, W. Chu, M. Liu, Chem. Eng. J. 209 (2012) 623-632.
[11] J. Wei, Iglsia, J. Catal. 224 (2004) 370-383.
[12] J.Z. Luo, Z.L. Yu, C.F. Ng, C.T. Au, J. Catal. 194 (2000) 198-210.
[13] T. Osaki, T. Mori, J. Catal. 204 (2001) 89-97.
[14] M.C.J. Bradford, M.A. Vannice, Appl. Catal. A 142 (1996) 97-122.
[15] A. Nandini, K.K. Pant, S.C. Dhingra, Appl. Catal. A. 308 (2006) 119-127.
[16] L.M. Aparicio, J. Catal. 165 (1997) 262-274.
[17] V.A. Tsipouriari, X.E. Verykios, Catal. Today 64 (2001) 83-90.
[18] Y. Cui, H. Zhang, H. Xu, W. Li, Appl. Catal. A 318 (2007) 79-88.
[19] G. Leofanti, M. Padovan, G. Tozzola, B. Venturelli, Catal. Today 41 (1998) 207-219.
[20] K. Sutthiumporn, S. Kawi, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 36 (2011) 14435-14446.
[21] H.S. Hyun-Seog Roh, K.W. Jun, Catal. Surv. Asia 12 (2008) 239-252.
[22] M. García-Diéguez, C. Herrera, M.Á. Larrubia, L.J. Alemany, Catal. Today 197 (2012) 50-57.
[23] P. Ferreira-Aparicio, A. Guerrero-Ruiz, I. Rodrı́guez-Ramos, Appl. Catal. A 170 (1998) 177-187.
[24] S. Wang, GQA. Lu, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 38 (1999) 2615-2625.
[25] Z.L. Zhang, X.E. Verykios, Catal. Today 21 (1994) 589-595.
[26] U. Olsbye, T. Wurzel, L. Mleczko, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 36 (1997) 5180-5188.
[27] J.F. Munera, S. Irusta, L.M. Cornaglia, E.A. Lombardo, D.V. Cesar, M. Schmal, J. Catal. 245 (2007) 25-34.
[28] T. Osaki, H. Fukaya, T. Horiuchi, K. Suzuki, T. Mori, J. Catal. 180 (1998) 106-109.
[29] F.M. Mark, F. Mark, W.F. Maier, Chem. Eng. Technol. 20 (1997) 361-370.
[30] J.T. Richardson, S.A. Paripatyadar, Appl. Catal. 61 (1990) 293-309.

Statistics
Article View: 66
PDF Download: 95